Systems
Four systems that take procedures from behavior analysis and relational frame theory and make them runnable in day-to-day practice — from authoring tasks through administration, recording, and review of progress.
A shared design premise
When an effective procedure fails to reach the field, the obstacle is usually not the difficulty of the theory but the load of the work. Assembling stimuli, randomizing order, recording each response, deciding whether criterion has been met: individually small, collectively enough that steps get dropped and the procedure falls out of use.
Our systems are designed to absorb that load. The practitioner is left with the decisions that require judgement, and procedural consistency follows as a by-product rather than requiring vigilance.
MTS — Matching-to-Sample
Tasks in which the learner selects among comparison stimuli given a sample, establishing conditional relations among stimuli. Image, audio, and text stimuli are supported, with stimulus sets organized hierarchically.
Presentation order can be randomized, feedback behaviour configured, and trial counts and mastery criteria set per assignment. Images carry attribution metadata and display credits at presentation.
SE — Stimulus Equivalence
Systematic training and testing of relations that were never directly trained but derive from trained ones. Reflexivity, symmetry, and transitivity each have their own test sequences, and training and testing phases are administered separately.
Which relations to train and which to reserve for testing remains a design decision for the practitioner or researcher; the system handles constructing and administering the sequences.
RFS — Relational Frame Skill
Assessment and training of relational framing — responding to stimuli in terms of their relations to one another — grounded in relational frame theory (RFT).
Relational framing means responding on the basis of the relation between stimuli rather than their formal properties. The system can express the families of relations treated in relational frame theory as task families, and is designed to accommodate additional frames. Because it is not fixed to a particular set of relations, its scope can widen as the research and the demands of practice develop.
Where MTS and SE address relations among individual stimulus pairs, RFS extends that work to broader patterns of relating. These skills underlie flexibility in language and thought, and the system exists to make them a direct target of intervention.
Assessment and training run as a single sequence within the framework of Relational Frame Skill Training (RFST).
WS — Work Sample
Work tasks for vocational rehabilitation. Performance on work resembling actual job duties is used to assess and train both accuracy and rate.
Four modes are available — assessment, training, self-check, and work-rate training. Because the same task can be switched between evaluative and instructional use, the transition from assessment to training happens within a single framework.
Multiple sets are available per task category, so assignments can be matched to the individual's current level.
Licensing
The systems are licensed to support agencies, educational institutions, and research institutions. Pricing, scale of use, and trial availability are discussed individually.
[Once pricing is settled, state either a price table or an explicit "contact us for pricing" policy here. Whether to publish prices is a commercial decision, but leaving the question unanswered tends to lose enquiries before they are made.]